Advanced Linear DP
What is this?
This is still one-dimensional DP โ you move along a single line โ but now each answer is found by trying many options and keeping the best one, instead of just reading a fixed neighbor. Picture making change for an amount: to know the fewest coins for 30 cents, you test every coin and reuse the already-solved smaller amounts. Because you remember those smaller answers, you never re-solve them, and this is exactly where being greedy and grabbing the biggest coin first can quietly give the wrong answer.
๐ก Fun fact: The U.S. coin system is "canonical," so greedily grabbing the largest coin always works for it โ which is exactly why Coin Change feels easy until an interviewer hands you oddball denominations like 1, 3, and 4 and the greedy trick falls apart.
๐ The 4 problems in this chapter are free. Sign in with Google or Microsoft to start solving.
Core idea: Still one dimension, but now each
dp[i]is computed by scanning a set of choices rather than reading one or two fixed neighbors. The transition asks "which coin / which pass / which split / which predecessor do I commit to here?" and takes the best. This is where DP starts to clearly beat greedy โ because the locally-best choice is no longer safe.
The shape
The cost of each state rises from O(1) to O(#choices), but the structure is still a single sweep that reuses earlier answers.
The problems
- Coin Change โ unbounded knapsack:
dp[a] = min(dp[a-c]+1); DP precisely because greedy fails for arbitrary denominations. - Minimum Cost For Tickets โ at each travel day choose which pass (1/7/30-day) to let expire by looking back.
- Integer Break โ maximize a product by trying every split point (with the all-3s greedy as the elegant shortcut).
- Longest String Chain โ LIS in disguise: order words by length and extend from one-char-shorter predecessors.
Key takeaways
- Each state scans a set of choices and takes the best โ the step up from basic linear DP.
- This is the canonical "greedy fails โ use DP" zone (Coin Change is the poster child).
- Order the subproblems so dependencies are solved first (amounts ascending, words by length).
- Recognize disguises โ Longest String Chain is LIS; many DPs are old patterns reskinned.
- Why interviewers love it: choosing the right state and choice-set is the heart of DP design.
Start here: Coin Change, then Minimum Cost For Tickets.
Core idea: A word can only chain onto a shorter word, so if you process words from shortest to longest, every possible predecessor is already solved โ and you find a word's predecessors by deleting one character from it in every position.
Problem, rephrased
Imagine you maintain the changelog of a configuration key whose name kept growing one character at a time across releases: a โ ab โ bda โ bdca. Each release inserted exactly one character somewhere into the previous name (front, middle, or back) โ never two, never zero. Given a pile of historical names, you want the longest evolution chain you can reconstruct: a sequence of names where each is the immediate predecessor of the next.
Formally (LeetCode 1048): word A is a predecessor of word B if you can insert exactly one character anywhere in A to get B โ equivalently, len(B) == len(A) + 1 and deleting one character from B (at some position) yields A. No reordering of the existing letters is allowed. A word chain is a sequence w1, w2, ..., wk where each wi is a predecessor of w(i+1). Return the length of the longest such chain you can build from the given list. A single word is a chain of length 1.
Input words |
Output | A longest chain |
|---|---|---|
["a","b","ba","bca","bda","bdca"] |
4 |
a โ ba โ bda โ bdca |
["xbc","pcxbcf","xb","cxbc","pcxbc"] |
5 |
xb โ xbc โ cxbc โ pcxbc โ pcxbcf |
["abcd","dbqca"] |
1 |
neither chains onto the other โ just one word |
Sign in to continue reading
The rest of this lesson is available with a free account. Signing in with Google or Microsoft is free.
Sign in to read the full lesson